Just why we can never accept the digital identity. History noun 1. the study of past events, particularly in human affairs. "medieval European history" Similar: the past former times historical events days of old the old days the good old days time gone by bygone days the before times yesterday antiquity days of yore the olden days yesteryear the eld Opposite: the future 2. the whole series of past events connected with a particular person or thing. The Charlie Kirk Assassination September 10 2025. When files are being deleted and Wikipedia pages altered and our memories erased before our eyes, why would we accept a digital identity? How many Hillary Clinton files deleted? Biden laptop gone. Weiner laptop gone. Insurance policies after all. No technology in our bodies. No. Erased and replaced. The Prime Minister or king of the world BB, told us there is no device that cannot be hacked. The Digital Id was rolled out in India and proved to ...
TPUSA is in great danger of becoming obsolete. You may as well pack up and call it a day. Andrew lacks the drive, conviction and sheer energy that was Charlie Kirk. Not only does this man look guilty of something and I am not accusing, but Andy you look guilty as hell of something. You lack charisma and you lack conviction. You lack inspiration and in short you come across as a constipated weasel. This is because you have no moral convictions of your own, no authority in your voice or stature. You trying very hard and this is the problem when filling someone's footsteps. You never wore his shoes. You never listened and you never took notes. You watched him with jealousy and thought that what Charlie did was easy. Anyone could pull it off. But being Charlie Kirk belongs to Charlie only. No one will replicate his energy and what he built he built out of conviction. All you did was follow in his footsteps and you...